А сколько раз в итоге обращаешься к оригинальному тексту? 2,3,5 раз?
Одно время страдал этой фигней, воду разливал. Потом начал вести лаконичные конспекты в виде аутлайнера и жизнь наладилась, теперь в основном ключевые поинты моих размышлений.
Например вот этот материал родился из заметки ниже.
Disease of too many links
- Too often we fall to a trap of making connection in places that only seem to be connected.
- We are afraid to make leave a note or a piece of knowledge without connection. That was the case with me, when I was doing baby steps in note-taking.
- With time, I’ve found a balanced mapping.
- The reason the graph is useless is because of all noise that in produces with excessive links.
- They are the same as highlighting must be added sparingly.
- We tend to look at the graph as at our brain, with everything connected to everything, but the most important graphs are the ones where blank connection exist. Not fully connected graph is the graph that conveys the most knowledge.
- People try to be profound by constantly comparing one with another, until the moment the graph is fully connected and totally useless.
- The remedy is specific knowledge and further research.
- As soon as you understand the topic, you begin to see things for what they really are, and the most crucial comparison is subtractive comparison. Not how things are alike, but how they not alike.
- Many think that such narrowness it is a sign of something, say it might be considered lowly and not deep enough.
- But poets, for example, don’t think like that. They need exact word for exact purpose. Too broad meaning brings ambiguity to the poem.
- Links that we use in our vaults must connect certain things and disconnect the others.
- Nothing bad about narrowing the scope by excluding some possibilities and intensifying propositions.
- Links are poetry, if you have too broad linking you end up with something that is too noisy and vast and in the end isn’t true. And this is bad poetry.